Looking back at your messages, I get the feeling that you ARE being serious... that you're a proper Icke-head. So on that assumption...
How do you know I haven't read it? You're assuming I'm completely unfamiliar with David Icke's work and philosophy simply because I dismiss it. That's a pretty fundamentalist attitude.
The fact is, back in the late-80s / early-90s when Icke was just starting to warm to his theme, I examined what he was saying. And I find his general approach completely unsatisfactory. He bases a significant amount of what he says on "revealed knowledge" (i.e. stuff that cannot be independently verified). Having escaped one religious doctrime (Catholicism) which stakes a claim on Universal Truth, I have no interest in becoming embroiled with a low-budget version.
If Icke could genuinely prove his allegations about (e.g.) September 11th 2001, then why is he charging 16 quid a pop for people to read them. Believe me, if I had that information and a functioning website, there's no way I wouldn't publish it as far and wide as possible... try to get as many people to read it as possible; not try to earn cash from it.
Sorry dude, I gave Icke the time of day 15 years ago. He had nothing to say to me then. He has done precisely nothing to change that view in the intervening years.
|