=
×

Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Stonehenge
Log In to post a reply
35 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
GLADMAN
950 posts

Re: Stonehenge
Feb 13, 2021, 11:03
[/quote]

Well being a sceptic, I do feel more info is needed. For some reason 17th century teeth and Gary Denke goes through my mind.
I think proof either way can never be found and that 'media news' is just that.
But it is an interesting flutter of speculation in an otherwise miserable period of life........[/quote]

These wrecked and buried 'possible circles' are certainly interesting, to say the least. Seen quite a few in my time and have left thinking 'are you sure?' The Mam C and I didn't venture here when visiting the excellent nearby Bedd yr Afanc some years back precisely because of the lack of above-ground features. Would be beneficial for a balanced view to understand the pros and cons, since MPP does have a bit of a reputation - does he not? - which clearly galvanises opinion.
In reply to:
Re: Stonehenge (moss)		 Replies:
Re: Stonehenge (tomatoman)
Topic Outline:
The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index