moss
|
Edited Feb 12, 2021, 09:21
Stonehenge
Feb 12, 2021, 09:19
|
Guardian News on the 'Lost Circle of Pembrokeshire'
https://tinyurl.com/1qrhmkzv
And Professor Alice Roberts covering this tonight on Stonehenge The Lost Circle Revealed, BBC2 at 9 pm
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000s5xm
|
Monganaut
|
Re: Stonehenge
Feb 12, 2021, 13:35
|
Will tune into that, was just reading about the finds here too...
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/02/england-s-stonehenge-was-erected-wales-first
|
thesweetcheat
|
Re: Stonehenge
Feb 12, 2021, 13:48
|
Here's our page (looks like only Kammer has visited):
https://www.themodernantiquarian.com/site/3992/waun_mawn_row_circle.html
|
moss
|
Re: Stonehenge
Feb 12, 2021, 14:38
|
|
Yes I noticed that, shame on TMA for neglect ;)
|
thesweetcheat
|
Re: Stonehenge
Feb 12, 2021, 17:23
|
|
moss wrote: Yes I noticed that, shame on TMA for neglect ;)
Shame! Shame!
|
Sanctuary
|
Re: Stonehenge
Feb 13, 2021, 09:01
|
Hi Moss
Put this in your search engine for the Academic report.
https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2020.239
Roy x
|
Sanctuary
|
Re: Stonehenge
Feb 13, 2021, 09:37
|
|
Sanctuary wrote:
And here's a reply to it. Is this just yet another latest yearly sensation at SH?
https://brian-mountainman.blogspot.com/
|
moss
|
Re: Stonehenge
Feb 13, 2021, 10:47
|
|
Sanctuary wrote:
Well being a sceptic, I do feel more info is needed. For some reason 17th century teeth and Gary Denke goes through my mind.
I think proof either way can never be found and that 'media news' is just that.
But it is an interesting flutter of speculation in an otherwise miserable period of life........
|
GLADMAN
|
Re: Stonehenge
Feb 13, 2021, 11:03
|
[/quote]
Well being a sceptic, I do feel more info is needed. For some reason 17th century teeth and Gary Denke goes through my mind.
I think proof either way can never be found and that 'media news' is just that.
But it is an interesting flutter of speculation in an otherwise miserable period of life........[/quote]
These wrecked and buried 'possible circles' are certainly interesting, to say the least. Seen quite a few in my time and have left thinking 'are you sure?' The Mam C and I didn't venture here when visiting the excellent nearby Bedd yr Afanc some years back precisely because of the lack of above-ground features. Would be beneficial for a balanced view to understand the pros and cons, since MPP does have a bit of a reputation - does he not? - which clearly galvanises opinion.
|
tomatoman
|
Re: Stonehenge
Feb 13, 2021, 13:13
|
The subject of Stonehenge always elicits controversy and I can understand why, but I've never understood the antipathy towards MPP. Is it "science-led"?
I saw him at a lecture at Leicester University 5 or 6 years ago, arranged by the Leicestershire Field-walkers Group and the first thing he acknowledged when he got on his feet was that the audience was peppered with sceptics, not of his subject, but HIM.
In my experience, that's in the nature of archaeological endeavour. I just don't understand why it's gets so personal.
|
