|
The Modern Antiquarian Forum » Epiphanie photography by Gilbert Le Cossec |
Log In to post a reply
|
|
|
|
| Topic View: Flat | Threaded | |
Sanctuary 4670 posts |
Oct 17, 2013, 13:27
|
||
|
nigelswift wrote: I see that rather than giving a simple example he's gone off to another place where people are more open minded! Well, to be fair...he may not have access to the Internet at present and/or be away from home. Time will tell.
|
|||
|
nigelswift 8112 posts |
Oct 17, 2013, 13:42
|
||
|
No, he HAS gone off to another place where people are more open minded! You get annoyed by the display of human remains, I get peed off with the procession of people determined to proclaim The Truth who then sod off if people don't accept it straight away!
|
|||
Natural Sceptic 23 posts |
Oct 18, 2013, 20:50
|
||
|
lol. I haven't 'gone' anywhere, I'm still here in the same place :) This site does not have reply notification, so one must keep checking back. I thought the thread wasn't going so tried elsewhere too... What sort of 'example' are you after? The water uphill thing? I really don't know is the answer. Water comes out of hillsides though, out of the top of hills/mountains, it rises in Glastonbury tor for example. When I said bringing water channels into an area, I wasn't thinking of bringing them uphill Really, this is about if anyone knows about a photographic technique. I'm just someone who's interested in energies and would like to photograph them if possible. i don't know much about anything of the ins & outs. I fell as if I'm being cross examined :)
|
|||
tiompan 5758 posts |
Oct 18, 2013, 21:55
|
||
Looks like Holger has explained it , i.e. colorvir .
|
|||
|
nigelswift 8112 posts |
Oct 19, 2013, 07:34
|
||
|
Natural Sceptic wrote: I fell as if I'm being cross examined :) Sorry, but if you say things like "As for the placing of 'stones' their points are usually marking out, or reinforcing the sacred geometry of the site, anchoring & storing energy. Really, I thought all this was pretty basic" .... you're bound to get questions. You're lucky no-one said "no it's not basic it's bullshit" (which would be just as reasonable as what you said!)
|
|||
|
Natural Sceptic 23 posts |
Oct 19, 2013, 09:11
|
||
|
nigelswift wrote: Natural Sceptic wrote: I fell as if I'm being cross examined :) Sorry, but if you say things like "As for the placing of 'stones' their points are usually marking out, or reinforcing the sacred geometry of the site, anchoring & storing energy. Really, I thought all this was pretty basic" .... you're bound to get questions. You're lucky no-one said "no it's not basic it's bullshit" (which would be just as reasonable as what you said!) Point taken, but for the record, here's the original in context quote: 'My original question was full of the excitement of finally photographing the activity of the places i regularly visit. I don'y know the answers of how the energies I have grown to love behave, I only want to photograph them As for the placing of 'stones' their points are usually marking out, or reinforcing the sacred geometry of the site, anchoring & storing energy. Really, I thought all this was pretty basic' I'll answer any questions (best I can) anyone has the best I can
|
|||
|
Sanctuary 4670 posts |
Edited Oct 19, 2013, 09:39
Oct 19, 2013, 09:18
|
||
|
Natural Sceptic wrote: Really, this is about if anyone knows about a photographic technique. I'm just someone who's interested in energies and would like to photograph them if possible. i don't know much about anything of the ins & outs. I fell as if I'm being cross examined :) Hi NS. I'm not (quite) such a sceptic as Nigel, but I understand exactly where he is coming from on this occasion, but I think it is you who should be cross-questioning the person who is making all the claims if you don't mind me saying, instead of just taking it all at face value. No offence intended.
|
|||
|
nigelswift 8112 posts |
Oct 19, 2013, 09:40
|
||
|
Yes I do appreciate it's your belief that the stones were for anchoring & storing energy but the thing is there are many here who don't share your belief - so saying it's "basic" isn't going to go down too well. "Basic for those who believe it" would be fine! :)
|
|||
|
Natural Sceptic 23 posts |
Oct 19, 2013, 10:53
|
||
|
Sanctuary wrote: Natural Sceptic wrote: Really, this is about if anyone knows about a photographic technique. I'm just someone who's interested in energies and would like to photograph them if possible. i don't know much about anything of the ins & outs. I fell as if I'm being cross examined :) Hi NS. I'm not (quite) such a sceptic as Nigel, but I understand exactly where he is coming from on this occasion, but I think it is you who should be cross-questioning the person who is making all the claims if you don't mind me saying, instead of just taking it all at face value. No offence intended. Non taken :) I understand where Nigel is coming from. Apologies for any antagonism I've been interested in earth energies for 25 years and even now keep questioning (and sometimes changing) what I feel to be a reasonable representation of what's going on. I am the natural sceptic after all ;) One thing, regardless of how one explains anything, is one's own feel of how energies behave in certain areas, and this cannot be ignored. In some ways it is the ultimate acid test. I have seen the same reaction in many other people, some who have very little experience, or even sceptical and watched them react in the same way in these places, after a little time to awake that sensation in them I have also constructed a 'temple' (actually a stone circle) using the method I described, and sure enough there is now an energy field to be felt there, exactly the same as established sites elsewhere Under favourable conditions (usually at night), but in the day too, the atmospheric condition around sacred sites/standing stones (and other energy devises) can be seen to be different, more active than away from them (here I go again) and it is this effect I am attempting (and have tried) to capture on film Regards, Nigel
|
|||
|
Sanctuary 4670 posts |
Oct 19, 2013, 11:24
|
||
|
Natural Sceptic wrote: Sanctuary wrote: Natural Sceptic wrote: Really, this is about if anyone knows about a photographic technique. I'm just someone who's interested in energies and would like to photograph them if possible. i don't know much about anything of the ins & outs. I fell as if I'm being cross examined :) Hi NS. I'm not (quite) such a sceptic as Nigel, but I understand exactly where he is coming from on this occasion, but I think it is you who should be cross-questioning the person who is making all the claims if you don't mind me saying, instead of just taking it all at face value. No offence intended. Non taken :) I understand where Nigel is coming from. Apologies for any antagonism I've been interested in earth energies for 25 years and even now keep questioning (and sometimes changing) what I feel to be a reasonable representation of what's going on. I am the natural sceptic after all ;) One thing, regardless of how one explains anything, is one's own feel of how energies behave in certain areas, and this cannot be ignored. In some ways it is the ultimate acid test. I have seen the same reaction in many other people, some who have very little experience, or even sceptical and watched them react in the same way in these places, after a little time to awake that sensation in them I have also constructed a 'temple' (actually a stone circle) using the method I described, and sure enough there is now an energy field to be felt there, exactly the same as established sites elsewhere Under favourable conditions (usually at night), but in the day too, the atmospheric condition around sacred sites/standing stones (and other energy devises) can be seen to be different, more active than away from them (here I go again) and it is this effect I am attempting (and have tried) to capture on film Regards, Nigel That's all extremely interesting and I guess sums up what other people have often said, that often it is a 'personal' thing, which although others can't/don't have an affinity with/to, is nevertheless real to another person and 'felt/seen' by them. I have a friend who dowsers and is totally committed to it and I think you need to know such people VERY well indeed to recognise that what they are feeling/seeing is real and exists to them but maybe not to others. We have a great deal to learn yet and should be open to all until such times that it is proven beyond a doubt to be absolute rubbish.
|
| Pages: 5 – [ Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next ] | Add a reply to this topic |
|
|
|
| The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index | |
