Unsung Forum » The Opposite of Reissues |
Log In to post a reply
|
|
|
Topic View: Flat | Threaded |
Jim Tones 5142 posts |
Apr 25, 2005, 19:56
|
||
...but to some people, somewhere, it's a masterpiece!
|
|||
dave clarkson 2988 posts |
Apr 25, 2005, 19:56
|
||
what's facism
|
|||
Tangerine Pete 487 posts |
Apr 25, 2005, 20:00
|
||
nope. who would have taken Bob Dylan seriously if his first named was Sparky?
|
|||
Tangerine Pete 487 posts |
Apr 25, 2005, 20:03
|
||
a political culture of violence that happens when your finger slips and misses the "s" on the keyboard : )
|
|||
Tangerine Pete 487 posts |
Apr 25, 2005, 20:07
|
||
well i'd like to meet them-- I could do with a laugh. Especially since clarkson thinks I'm advocating a program of cd burnings apparently : )
|
|||
Jim Tones 5142 posts |
Apr 25, 2005, 20:19
|
||
>well i'd like to meet them-- I could do with a laugh. One person's meat, is another one's poison.
|
|||
Tangerine Pete 487 posts |
Apr 25, 2005, 21:17
|
||
no. like at University, musicians are students who are there to perform good work. At University, turning in poor work is met with a quick and decisive rebuke. If it's a literature course, turning in an analysis of Tess of the D'Arbavilles in which your central premise holds that Hardy was in essence a kooky fun loving type whose work was of the why can't we all just get along variety is not valid. Similarly, Petra Haden's reinterpretation of the Who's work is ill-conceived, poorly executed, and simiply poor quality work. She gets an F. Though I think it's noble to champion freedom of expression, I think we need controls in this society to stop the proliferation of poor work. It adds nothing to the culture. Whether some fool enjoys it is often, not always, but often, entirely bedside the point.
|
|||
Tangerine Pete 487 posts |
Apr 25, 2005, 21:18
|
||
no. like at University, musicians are students who are there to perform good work. At University, turning in poor work is met with a quick and decisive rebuke. If it's a literature course, turning in an analysis of Tess of the D'Arbavilles in which your central premise holds that Hardy was in essence a kooky fun loving type whose work was of the why can't we all just get along variety is not valid. Similarly, Petra Haden's reinterpretation of the Who's work is ill-conceived, poorly executed, and simiply poor quality work. She gets an F. Though I think it's noble to champion freedom of expression, I think we need controls in this society to stop the proliferation of poor work. It adds nothing to the culture. Whether some fool enjoys it is often, not always, but often, entirely bedside the point.
|
|||
Tangerine Pete 487 posts |
Apr 25, 2005, 21:19
|
||
beside that was. bloody keyboard
|
|||
dave clarkson 2988 posts |
Apr 25, 2005, 21:26
|
||
..are you having a laugh here Pete?
|
Pages: 10 – [ Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Next ] | Add a reply to this topic |
|
|
Unsung Forum Index |