there's been a lot of cries of "no censorship" in this thread. it's not an act of censorship to say "this piece of writing isn't what the head heritage website is looking for". people are entirely free to post their reviews to other places on the internet. like the amazon reviews section, for instance, where I believe certain unsung reviews appear in any case. or on your own website, should you have one (and if you don't you're always free to start one). its not an act of censorship to say "julian cope is not prepared to pay for this particular piece of your writing to be available online". is mr. cope supposed to pay for everything we want to say? these cries of "censorship" are a completely bogus argument.
|