Hang on. Read my first posting on this (at 10.31) and you'll realise I agree with you. My second posting (at 14.12) was regarding a SEPARATE issue of using the cameras for surveillance, rather than identifying cars for the congestion charge. Did you read the link I posted up?
I agree with the congestion charge totally and for all the reasons you list. I do not agree with the cameras also being used to focus on drivers faces and an identification system used by the police without any public consultation. The two views are not incompatible.
|