pooley wrote: [Say the unemployed mugs and kills someone for their wallet/ Mobile Phone/ Packet of prawn cocktail - whatever. Do you think they should be dealt with more leniently than the rich banker who kills someone for millions?
Isnt the crime exactly the same, just the level of reward different
If that person is starving and kills for food then no, it's not the same as someone super-rich killing to have even more money.
In the same way, a chronically abused partner gets a lighter sentence than someone who kills their spouse for the insurance payout. It's not a wacky idea, it's even a principle recognised in law with the practice of sentencing spectrums for any given crime.
|