I can see how it would sound like simple "for us or against us"-ism... I suppose I do have a bit of frustration with the lack of positive suggestions from the anti-war camp, for example Michael Moore and Howard Zinn and so on... everything I hear from them is very simple-minded nonsense that doesn't offer a bit of a suggestion (short of a time machine to correct past wrongs) as to what might be done.
So.... should Hussein have been removed? If you think not, then I have a hard time considering you a serious person. If so, then by what method?
I do not doubt that there is a legitimate answer to that question, and a legitimate , responsible anti-war position. I just don't hear it.