tiompan wrote: Sanctuary wrote: tiompan wrote: tiompan wrote: Sanctuary wrote: tiompan wrote:
It's the small stone between the the ante-chamber stone and the doorstone
Are you referring to the packing stone at the top of the 'buttress' George?
Yes
Except I wouldn't describe it as a buttress .
Not originally no.
If it was a buttress why the padstone and why isn't at more functional acute angle to actually act like a buttress ? The more obvious simpler explanation is that it is what it appears to be , an ante chamber stone .
You've missed two important points George. Look at the top of the 'buttress' and it will tell you why a padstone was required between it and the closure stone. Secondly, the closure is 21.75" out of upright pushing the 'buttress' stone into a steeper angle than it originally was.
No disrespect intended to everyone following this discussion but I'm deffo leaving it now as I've given all the clues I want to give. It was fun for me working it out as I freed my mind of what I'd been fed in the past. Won't be long now before you'll all know and can judge me on it.
|