harestonesdown wrote: bladup wrote: harestonesdown wrote: bladup wrote: No but it's only right because we're talking about it because of your book, i suppose it might be quite interesting for you to see if somebody who knows a bit like Geoff would end up at the same conclusion as you though Roy.
http://i50.tinypic.com/fnfsqd.jpg
:)
Great, that capstone looks a lot more balanced.
I know little about the quoit Paul, though looking at pics on google that front blocking stone looks un-natural there. Has anyone suggested or is it accepted etc that it was placed there later and the capstone raised to accommodate it ?
I really should have kept up with this thread. :)
The place never feels right to me when i'm there and maybe Roys book will give me the answer i've wondered about since first thinking - that isn't right in 2002.
|