Harryshill wrote: Lol. Of course I'm not a archaeologist. But I can say if I were, That judging from the lack of support there is (So far) for change. that I could conclude that there is no real support for it from tma'ers
Trying to make me look a arse, will not help you win the argument.
Who's trying to make you look like an arse? If you're going to put forward irrational arguments, am I not allowed to point that out without you framing it as a personal attack?
Concluding that there's no real support *amongst TMAers* would be far more reasonable. But then we're talking about a cross-section of about eight people, which lets face it, is an irrelevance. Even if all eight of us were pro-restoration, it would hardly represent a compelling groundswell of public opinion.
|