The Modern Antiquarian Forum » Avebury » Developments at Avebury |
Log In to post a reply
|
|
|
Topic View: Flat | Threaded |
Littlestone 5386 posts |
Jul 31, 2011, 14:02
|
||
...but only for the day. This is a nice little story - “...the idea of the project was to show children that history did not start with the Romans, Anglo Saxons and Vikings, as history books sometimes depict, but much earlier with the people who built the great monuments like Avebury, Silbury Hill and Stonehenge more than 4,000 years ago. “Under Mrs Swanton’s guidance children from St Mary’s Roman Catholic Primary School in Swindon built an exact replica of one of the buried stones in the Kennett Avenue and used their paper-covered chicken wire “stone” to fill in one of the gaps in the avenue – but just for one day.” More here - http://www.thisiswiltshire.co.uk/news/9165931.Youngsters_build_on_pre_history_at_Avebury/
|
|||
Sanctuary 4670 posts |
Jul 31, 2011, 16:19
|
||
Littlestone wrote: ...but only for the day. This is a nice little story - “...the idea of the project was to show children that history did not start with the Romans, Anglo Saxons and Vikings, as history books sometimes depict, but much earlier with the people who built the great monuments like Avebury, Silbury Hill and Stonehenge more than 4,000 years ago. “Under Mrs Swanton’s guidance children from St Mary’s Roman Catholic Primary School in Swindon built an exact replica of one of the buried stones in the Kennett Avenue and used their paper-covered chicken wire “stone” to fill in one of the gaps in the avenue – but just for one day.” More here - http://www.thisiswiltshire.co.uk/news/9165931.Youngsters_build_on_pre_history_at_Avebury/ Good for them. It looked like a 'female' stone...I hope its opposite number was one of the boys to keep the story alive!! :D
|
|||
tjj 3606 posts |
Jul 31, 2011, 17:06
|
||
Sanctuary wrote: Littlestone wrote: ...but only for the day. This is a nice little story - “...the idea of the project was to show children that history did not start with the Romans, Anglo Saxons and Vikings, as history books sometimes depict, but much earlier with the people who built the great monuments like Avebury, Silbury Hill and Stonehenge more than 4,000 years ago. “Under Mrs Swanton’s guidance children from St Mary’s Roman Catholic Primary School in Swindon built an exact replica of one of the buried stones in the Kennett Avenue and used their paper-covered chicken wire “stone” to fill in one of the gaps in the avenue – but just for one day.” More here - http://www.thisiswiltshire.co.uk/news/9165931.Youngsters_build_on_pre_history_at_Avebury/ Good for them. It looked like a 'female' stone...I hope its opposite number was one of the boys to keep the story alive!! :D Yes a nice little story - I'm all for engaging the children of Swindon in the rich archaeological heritage of the county they live in; particularly as in this case it is a church school.
|
|||
hedgeling 9 posts |
Nov 21, 2011, 19:15
|
||
I miss the tree avenues, perhaps more tree planting would be popular? If Avebury is the great nemeton,sacred grove of the druids then would of been loads more trees, woods,groves and clearings with the cove in middle. Maybe a big hedge on the top of the banks? They found the shrines to Nemotina godess of the moon and Mars appollo at Bath, known to be the site of another Nemeton. Miss the trees though. Keiler in his clearance restoration Zeal dynamited trees i seam to remember. Dont like the white rendering, but whats underneath? you may find there was a good reason for putting it on and the brickwork is dodgy. the social club maynot be too attractive but hiding it would certainly not improve its profitability. Would advocate putting up the buried stones though.
|
|||
Sanctuary 4670 posts |
Nov 22, 2011, 08:12
|
||
hedgeling wrote: I miss the tree avenues, perhaps more tree planting would be popular? If Avebury is the great nemeton,sacred grove of the druids then would of been loads more trees, woods,groves and clearings with the cove in middle. Maybe a big hedge on the top of the banks? They found the shrines to Nemotina godess of the moon and Mars appollo at Bath, known to be the site of another Nemeton. Miss the trees though. Keiler in his clearance restoration Zeal dynamited trees i seam to remember. Dont like the white rendering, but whats underneath? you may find there was a good reason for putting it on and the brickwork is dodgy. the social club maynot be too attractive but hiding it would certainly not improve its profitability. Would advocate putting up the buried stones though. I'd love to see the stones re-erected for what I consider three good reasons. Firstly, other than being returned to their rightful place after being hauled off the Downs or wherever they originated from, it would give us a further opportunity to carry out live experiments in the lifting, moving (for more than a few feet in some cases) and erecting of them in what we believe could have been the methods used by our great ancestors. Thirdly, and maybe the most important, the pure archaeology involved in the finding and re-escavating of the stone holes. And wouldn't it look great to see more pieces of the jigsaw in place.
|
|||
tjj 3606 posts |
Edited Nov 22, 2011, 09:22
Nov 22, 2011, 09:19
|
||
Sanctuary wrote: hedgeling" wrote: Would advocate putting up the buried stones though. I'd love to see the stones re-erected for what I consider three good reasons. Firstly, other than being returned to their rightful place after being hauled off the Downs or wherever they originated from, it would give us a further opportunity to carry out live experiments in the lifting, moving (for more than a few feet in some cases) and erecting of them in what we believe could have been the methods used by our great ancestors. Thirdly, and maybe the most important, the pure archaeology involved in the finding and re-escavating of the stone holes. And wouldn't it look great to see more pieces of the jigsaw in place. I recall hearing a 'very good argument' why they should be left where they are but can't recall what the rationale was - perhaps it was to preserve the archaeology for the future generations when hopefully advancements in dating and conservation methods have been made. I would like to ask an 'Avebury' question. In the Alexander Keiller Museum it says that one of the worst offenders for smashing up the stones was someone from Berwick Bassett and I noticed on my last walk that the church at Berwick Bassett is built of sarsen. Does anyone know know if these were Avebury stones?
|
|||
VBB 558 posts |
Nov 22, 2011, 10:51
|
||
tjj wrote: [quote="Sanctuary"]I would like to ask an 'Avebury' question. In the Alexander Keiller Museum it says that one of the worst offenders for smashing up the stones was someone from Berwick Bassett and I noticed on my last walk that the church at Berwick Bassett is built of sarsen. Does anyone know know if these were Avebury stones? I think this is perhaps a reference to Caleb Baily, own of BB manor, but the sarsen nave there was constructed centuries prior to the birth of any of the named stone breakers.
|
|||
VBB 558 posts |
Nov 22, 2011, 15:03
|
||
VBB wrote: tjj wrote: [quote="Sanctuary"]I would like to ask an 'Avebury' question. In the Alexander Keiller Museum it says that one of the worst offenders for smashing up the stones was someone from Berwick Bassett and I noticed on my last walk that the church at Berwick Bassett is built of sarsen. Does anyone know know if these were Avebury stones? I think this is perhaps a reference to Caleb Baily, owner of BB manor, but the sarsen nave there was constructed centuries prior to the birth of any of the named stone breakers. In my reply elsewhere I pointed out that Baily was a non-conformist so the sarsens he harvested weren't destined for the church, but of course he promised to stop taking sarsen when threated by the Antiquaries so havi9ng taken fright may have abandoned or even buried sarsens that may have ended up being used when the church was rebuilt during the Gothic Revival. An interesting question - have to look at Mr Wyatt's plans.
|
|||
VBB 558 posts |
Nov 22, 2011, 15:04
|
||
VBB wrote: tjj wrote: [quote="Sanctuary"]I would like to ask an 'Avebury' question. In the Alexander Keiller Museum it says that one of the worst offenders for smashing up the stones was someone from Berwick Bassett and I noticed on my last walk that the church at Berwick Bassett is built of sarsen. Does anyone know know if these were Avebury stones? I think this is perhaps a reference to Caleb Baily, owner of BB manor, but the sarsen nave there was constructed centuries prior to the birth of any of the named stone breakers. In my reply elsewhere I pointed out that Baily was a non-conformist so the sarsens he harvested weren't destined for the church, but of course he promised to stop taking sarsen when threated by the Antiquaries so having taken fright may have abandoned or even buried sarsens that may have ended up being used when the church was rebuilt during the Gothic Revival. An interesting question - have to look at Mr Wyatt's plans.
|
|||
tjj 3606 posts |
Nov 22, 2011, 15:32
|
||
Many thanks for taking the trouble to reply VBB ... I believe there was a sarsen drift (and a stone circle) around there too so they weren't in short supply.
|
Pages: 36 – [ Previous | 1 … 29 30 31 32 33 34 | Next ] | Add a reply to this topic |
|
|
The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index |