goffik
|
Edited Feb 15, 2011, 00:21
Re: Developments at Avebury
Feb 15, 2011, 00:08
|
Not only that, but I'll double-post it again! And why not? Tsk.
Removed due to duplicate post.
G x
|
jackyboy
|
Re: Developments at Avebury
Feb 15, 2011, 00:18
|
|
goffik wrote: Interesting stuff, LS!
What I might do is ignore the majority of it and obsess about the toilets of that's ok? ;)
G x
My memory is not good. But I think there is possibly thousands of people visiting Avebury each year. A toilet would be good. Far more important than a tearoom don't you think. But maybe it's me.
|
goffik
|
Re: Developments at Avebury
Feb 15, 2011, 00:23
|
Yuh - toilets're good...
G x
(If this double-posts I'm bloody well leaving it ;) )
|
goffik
|
Re: Developments at Avebury
Feb 15, 2011, 00:23
|
Yuh - toilets're good...
G x
(If this double-posts I'm bloody well leaving it ;) )
|
jackyboy
|
Re: Developments at Avebury
Feb 15, 2011, 00:33
|
|
goffik wrote: Yuh - toilets're good...
G x
(If this double-posts I'm bloody well leaving it ;) )
Thats what I was thinking. Far too many people visting not to have a PC.
As for the national trust tarmacing a car park. Do they do that?
|
megadread
|
Edited Feb 15, 2011, 01:41
Re: Developments at Avebury
Feb 15, 2011, 01:14
|
|
jackyboy wrote: goffik wrote: Interesting stuff, LS!
What I might do is ignore the majority of it and obsess about the toilets of that's ok? ;)
G x
My memory is not good. But I think there is possibly thousands of people visiting Avebury each year. A toilet would be good. Far more important than a tearoom don't you think. But maybe it's me.
jackyboy, the toilets and the cafe are the same building but separate entities if you will.
On the front of the building there's the ladies entrance, to it's right is another entrance, that's the cafe, the gents are round the back.
The cafe and the toilets are really two separate issues, both can co-exist side by side, in fact, the cafe would benefit from them being open.
Edit: The main issue is, should they open a cafe in what was previously a store room, and a refusal for the croppies to open a cafe there themselfs, prior to the NT's plans.
|
Littlestone
|
Edited Feb 16, 2011, 06:14
The Diamond Stone
Feb 15, 2011, 08:50
|
|
goffik wrote: Interesting stuff, LS!
What I might do is ignore the majority of it and obsess about the toilets of that's ok? ;)
G x
Aye, meanwhile another Avebury ‘development’ worth thinking about?
If not a development, then certainly a worthy protect aimed at protecting the Diamond Stone from damage.
|
Sanctuary
|
Re: Developments at Avebury
Feb 15, 2011, 08:52
|
|
megadread wrote: jackyboy wrote: goffik wrote: Interesting stuff, LS!
What I might do is ignore the majority of it and obsess about the toilets of that's ok? ;)
G x
My memory is not good. But I think there is possibly thousands of people visiting Avebury each year. A toilet would be good. Far more important than a tearoom don't you think. But maybe it's me.
jackyboy, the toilets and the cafe are the same building but separate entities if you will.
On the front of the building there's the ladies entrance, to it's right is another entrance, that's the cafe, the gents are round the back.
The cafe and the toilets are really two separate issues, both can co-exist side by side, in fact, the cafe would benefit from them being open.
Edit: The main issue is, should they open a cafe in what was previously a store room, and a refusal for the croppies to open a cafe there themselfs, prior to the NT's plans.
Yes and on the croppies refusal notice would be the reasons for the rufusal wouldn't there...wonder how they'll worm there way around that one!
|
jackyboy
|
Re: Developments at Avebury
Feb 15, 2011, 09:00
|
|
Sanctuary wrote: megadread wrote: jackyboy wrote: goffik wrote: Interesting stuff, LS!
What I might do is ignore the majority of it and obsess about the toilets of that's ok? ;)
G x
My memory is not good. But I think there is possibly thousands of people visiting Avebury each year. A toilet would be good. Far more important than a tearoom don't you think. But maybe it's me.
jackyboy, the toilets and the cafe are the same building but separate entities if you will.
On the front of the building there's the ladies entrance, to it's right is another entrance, that's the cafe, the gents are round the back.
The cafe and the toilets are really two separate issues, both can co-exist side by side, in fact, the cafe would benefit from them being open.
Edit: The main issue is, should they open a cafe in what was previously a store room, and a refusal for the croppies to open a cafe there themselfs, prior to the NT's plans.
Yes and on the croppies refusal notice would be the reasons for the rufusal wouldn't there...wonder how they'll worm there way around that one!
I see. Thanks. It would depend on the basis of refusal. Possibly NT covered that one
|
Sanctuary
|
Re: Developments at Avebury
Feb 15, 2011, 09:01
|
|
megadread wrote: jackyboy wrote: goffik wrote: Interesting stuff, LS!
What I might do is ignore the majority of it and obsess about the toilets of that's ok? ;)
G x
My memory is not good. But I think there is possibly thousands of people visiting Avebury each year. A toilet would be good. Far more important than a tearoom don't you think. But maybe it's me.
jackyboy, the toilets and the cafe are the same building but separate entities if you will.
On the front of the building there's the ladies entrance, to it's right is another entrance, that's the cafe, the gents are round the back.
The cafe and the toilets are really two separate issues, both can co-exist side by side, in fact, the cafe would benefit from them being open.
Edit: The main issue is, should they open a cafe in what was previously a store room, and a refusal for the croppies to open a cafe there themselfs, prior to the NT's plans.
Dunno why they can't build a new toilet block adjacent to the car park. Seems the obvious place to me seeing how people want to have a pee the moment they arrive...or one before leaving. Or am I just being too sensible :D
|
