severial people have been kind enough to compliment me for not losing my temper. thanks.
here is something for you to use as cannon fodder against me. and it will give us another "silly" thing to discuss. it is from British Archaeology magazine for nov. dec. 2006.
i submitted my thesis to the editor, Mike Pitts about 2 years ago.
it will give you Mike Pitts' impression of my theory. that should make for good chat here. mr pitts did not immediately accept the theory, in fact he thought it was "silly". the actual word he used in his return email was, "fantastical". you'll have to read between the lines of the BA piece in order to see how graciously mr pitts poo pooed my theory....
or you can google " british archaeology stonehenge grain mill"
it should be the first hit.
please bear in mind that this was submitted to Mr pitts almost 2 years ago and he may have had enough time in order to change his mind by now.
I suspect that Mr. Pitts is a friend of some of you and i mean him no disrespect what so ever. I submitted the thesis to him out of respect and the fact that i thought british archaeology deserved first crack at it.
so you see i would hardly become enraged by your civil coments.