Head To Head
Log In
Register
The Modern Antiquarian Forum »
Henge corrals?
Log In to post a reply

152 messages
Topic View: Flat | Threaded
PeterH
PeterH
1180 posts

Henge corrals?
Dec 18, 2005, 17:18
Sometime back, Littlestone started a topic on the possibility of some stone circles being animal corrals. The balance of opinion was, I believe, probably not. However, I have recently been looking at my local henges and am plotting them on a map. So far, I have only looked at the 12 Essex henges and they are only visible as crop marks. I intend to map those throughout East Anglia.

First point that is apparent is that there is no consistent feature regarding entrances. Most have two gaps opposite each other, but some just one. There is no consistent position of the entrance gaps.
Boxted has entrances at N and S, Corringham at SW and NE, Cressing at E, Felsted at W, Wigborough at SE, Little Baddow at N and S, Little Bromley at NW and SE, Sturmer at NE. The others have no visible gaps.

That suggests to me that these henges do not have a religious/ritual purpose. The entrances are not consistent and are not aligned to sunsets, sunrises or anything else. They are just opposite entrances and that suggests driving stock into a holding pen and out the other side, perhaps afer counting them.

I am not aware of detailed excavation so cannot comment on whether there is evidence of nitrate enrichment which might be expected in a stock pen. There is no local stone and I am unaware of any post holes so can draw no conclusion regarding walls and stock holding capabilities. Finally, the shapes vary from circular to oval and unbalanced circular with the opposite gaps off-centre and to one side.

The value of looking afresh at East Anglian henges is that they are little known and we can leave aside the enormous ones of Wessex. Part of the problem lies in the way that we classify monuments. We say that a circular earthwork with a ditch and bank is a henge. Then we jump to the conclusion that all of the things in our "henge " category were built to serve the same purpose. That cannot be right.

Finally - I am glad to see the term "ring-ditch" being used more outside its more usual Norman time slot. Nothing wrong with that as we don't insist that the term "barrow" only correctly applies to the Bronze Age. Time to re-examine these circular features, abandon the preconceptions that they are all the same and also time to forget the "henge" word where nothing whatsoever "hangs".
Topic Outline:

The Modern Antiquarian Forum Index