Julian Cope presents Head Heritage

I post so that people can read the paper first hand and make their own minds up. I'd suggest everyone does that rather than base their view on arguments on some forum. For a maths paper it's pretty readable.

All I'll say is think long and hard about the meaning of "not statistically significant" (especially when written by professional statisticians) before jumping to agree with people commenting negatively on the paper. I'm not going to bother getting in any arguments here: there are more fulfilling places for that. Strangely, RealClimate has been very quiet.

I do find it ironic that on a forum hosted by a heretic, heretical views on climate change are routinely attacked...