|
pooley wrote: reading this post is the forum equivalent of watching two people stick there fingers in there ears
Except that one of us walks the other through the established science while the other goes 'quick! over there!' and points to yet another long-discredited idea that 20 seconds googling could've sorted them out on.
pooley wrote: I do, however, worry that you are so passionate about it that you refuse to see any other point of view - resort to sarcasm and bullying.
Pooley, I do take your point mate, but if somebody says 'I don't think evolution really happened' I'll walk them through it. If they keep coming back with the same points, or tired, disproven twaddle from nutter Christians I'm going to treat their poor thinking as deliberate and subject it to the disdain it deserves.
This is not like arguing about moral issues where there's a need to maintain respect of position, but about continual denial of things that are verifiable and indeed the ability to reason clearly itself. If that doesn't merit belittling (alongside solid factual refutation), i don't know what does.
|